Subclinical Inflammation in Renal Transplant Recipients: Impact of Cyclosporine Microemulsion Versus Tacrolimus

Abstract Background Renal insufficiency and renal transplant (RT) provoke a microinflammatory state that leads to increased atherosclerosis. It is not fully known whether calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) play a role in the inflammation observed in these patients or whether any differences exist between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransplantation proceedings Vol. 39; no. 7; pp. 2170 - 2172
Main Authors Lauzurica, R, Pastor, M.C, Bayes, B, Malumbres, S, Homs, M, Llopis, M.A, Bonet, J, Romero, R
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.09.2007
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Renal insufficiency and renal transplant (RT) provoke a microinflammatory state that leads to increased atherosclerosis. It is not fully known whether calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) play a role in the inflammation observed in these patients or whether any differences exist between CNIs. Objectives The study aimed to establish differences in the inflammatory state of two groups treated with cyclosporine microemulsion (CyA) or tacrolimus (TC). Patients and methods This prospective study included 81 RT patients divided into two groups according to the CNI: CyA group, n = 35 versus TC group, n = 46. The markers of inflammation (MIF) were determined preRT and at 3 and 12 months’ postRT: C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid protein A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). Samples were collected in stable patients in the absence of rejection, active infection, or inflammatory processes. Results No significant differences existed between the markers of inflammation in the two treatment groups prior to transplantation. At 3 months’ posttransplant, patients treated with CyA showed significantly higher levels of IL-6 ( P = .05), SAA ( P = .03), and sIL-2R ( P = .008) compared with patients treated with TC. These differences were maintained for IL-6 ( P = .03) and sIL-2R ( P = .027) at 12 months’ posttransplant. A multivariate analysis at 3 months showed that only age [OR 10.1; CI (95% 2.6–38.4); P = .001], SAA [OR 4.8; IC (95% 1.4–16.5); P = .015], and sIL-2R [OR 4.9; IC (95% 1.5–16.2); P = .009] were independent predictors of the CNI used. At 12 months, age [OR 3.7; IC (95% 0.9–14.2] and sIL-2R [OR 6.04; IC (95% 1.5–23); P = .006] continued to be independent predictors. Conclusions Patients treated with CyA displayed significantly higher levels of inflammatory markers (IL-6, SAA, sIL-2R) at 3 and 12 months’ posttransplantation, independent of age, gender, time on dialysis, diabetes mellitus (preRT and de novo postRT), and renal function measured by serum creatinine.
ISSN:0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.023