Electrochemical sensor for sulfite determination based on a nanostructured copper-salen film modified electrode
The electrochemical preparation described herein involved the electrocatalytic oxidation of sulfite on a platinum electrode modified with nanostructured copper salen (salen = N, N′-ethylene bis(salicylideneiminato)) polymer films. The complex was prepared and electropolymerized at a platinum electro...
Saved in:
Published in | Electrochimica acta Vol. 54; no. 19; pp. 4552 - 4558 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
30.07.2009
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The electrochemical preparation described herein involved the electrocatalytic oxidation of sulfite on a platinum electrode modified with nanostructured copper salen (salen
=
N,
N′-ethylene
bis(salicylideneiminato)) polymer films. The complex was prepared and electropolymerized at a platinum electrode in a 0.1
mol
L
−1 solution of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate in acetonitrile by cyclic voltammetry between 0 and 1.4
V
vs. SCE. After cycling the modified electrode in a 0.50
mol
L
−1 KCl solution, the estimated surface concentration was found to be equal to 2.2
×
10
−9
mol
cm
−2. This is a typical behavior of an electrode surface immobilized with a redox couple that can usually be considered as a reversible single-electron reduction/oxidation of the copper(II)/copper(III) couple. The potential peaks of the modified electrode in the electrolyte solution (aqueous) containing the different anions increase with the decrease of the ionic radius, demonstrating that the counter-ions influence the voltammetric behavior of the sensor. The potential peak was found to be linearly dependent upon the ratio [ionic charge]/[ionic radius]. The oxidation of the sulfite anion was performed at the platinum electrode at +0.9
V
vs. SCE. However, a significant decrease in the overpotential (+0.45
V) was obtained while using the sensor, which minimized the effect of oxidizable interferences. A plot of the anodic current
vs. the sulfite concentration for chronoamperometry (potential fixed
=
+0.45
V) at the sensor was linear in the 4.0
×
10
−6 to 6.9
×
10
−5
mol
L
−1 concentration range and the concentration limit was 1.2
×
10
−6
mol
L
−1. The reaction order with respect to sulfite was determined by the slope of the logarithm of the current
vs. the logarithm of the sulfite concentration. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0013-4686 1873-3859 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.03.045 |