PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF YIELD VARIATION OF TEA (CAMELLIA SINENSIS) DURING DIFFERENT YEARS OF THE PRUNING CYCLE IN THE CENTRAL HIGHLANDS OF SRI LANKA

The objective of this study was to elucidate the physiological basis of the significant yield decline that occurs during the fourth year of the pruning cycle of tea. Biomass partitioning, which was hypothesized to be a major factor in causing this yield decline, was measured by destructive harvests...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExperimental agriculture Vol. 45; no. 4; pp. 429 - 450
Main Authors DE COSTA, W. A. J. M., NAVARATNE, D. M. S., ANANDACOOMARASWAMY, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.10.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objective of this study was to elucidate the physiological basis of the significant yield decline that occurs during the fourth year of the pruning cycle of tea. Biomass partitioning, which was hypothesized to be a major factor in causing this yield decline, was measured by destructive harvests of entire tea bushes, in two contrasting, mature, field-grown tea cultivars (TRI 2025 and DT1) at the end of different years of the pruning cycle. In both cultivars, yield showed continuous increases from year 1 to 3, followed by reductions of 44% and 35% in TRI2025 and DT1 respectively in the fourth year. Patterns of biomass partitioning to roots, stems or branches did not correlate with the above yield variation whereas harvest index, canopy leaf area index and mature leaf dry weight showed variations which paralleled the yield variation. The fourth-year decline in harvest index was brought about by reductions in both shoot number per m2 and mean individual shoot weight, which indicate a reduction in sink strength. Both cultivars showed reductions in light-saturated photosynthetic rate of maintenance foliage during the second half of the pruning cycle, indicating reduced source capacity. Hence, a combined reduction of both sink strength and source capacity during the fourth year could have brought about the significant yield reduction in tea. A significant increase of root starch in the fourth year indicated a down-regulation of physiological activities of the bush towards the end of the pruning cycle. Mechanisms responsible for this down-regulation need to be elucidated by further research.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479709990482
ark:/67375/6GQ-ZH45GFZ6-2
istex:3000AF00AD3C9746B6DB8E1B534A2DE8E48F4EAA
PII:S0014479709990482
ArticleID:99048
ISSN:0014-4797
1469-4441
DOI:10.1017/S0014479709990482