Harmonization of the fastest and densest responses reflects humanlike reaction time in mice

Reaction time (RT) is important for evaluating delayed latency in behavior. Unlike humans, whose RT usually reflects a one-to-one stimulus-response relationship, the RT of animals can show two peaks representing the fastest and densest responses in the response distribution due to multiple responses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 19; p. 1501374
Main Author Kim, Chan Hee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 29.01.2025
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reaction time (RT) is important for evaluating delayed latency in behavior. Unlike humans, whose RT usually reflects a one-to-one stimulus-response relationship, the RT of animals can show two peaks representing the fastest and densest responses in the response distribution due to multiple responses per trial and can be further delayed depending on stimulus duration. Stimulus duration was controlled to investigate whether these two peak latencies align to form a single RT. Sound cues lasting 10, 5, and 2 s, each associated with a food reward of condensed milk, were tested in three groups of 24 mice using delay conditioning paradigm. The frequency and latency of responses, along with basic indices such as accuracy, were analyzed. In delay conditioning experiments using sound cues of 10, 5, and 2 s, the 2 s group exhibited the strongest positive correlations between the two peaks, as well as between the number of responses and accuracy rate, suggesting a coupling of the fastest and densest responses and a one-to-one relationship between stimulus and response. Based on these findings, I propose harmonizing the two peaks, elicited by stimuli that induce prompt and minimal responses, as a criterion for designing animal experiments to better mimic humanlike RT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Maksym V. Kopanitsa, The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
Lidia Cabeza Álvarez, EA481 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Intégratives et Cliniques, France
Edited by: Morgan Thomsen, Region Hovedstad Psychiatry, Denmark
ISSN:1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2025.1501374