Meta-Analysis of the Association of the Cathepsin D Ala224Val Gene Polymorphism with the Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease: A HuGE Gene-Disease Association Review
A C-to-T polymorphism in exon 2 of the cathepsin D gene encoding cathepsin D (CTSD) has been implicated as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. The authors performed a meta-analysis of 14 studies (16 comparisons) with CTSD genotyping (3,174 Alzheimer’s disease cases and 3,298 controls). Overall, t...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of epidemiology Vol. 159; no. 6; pp. 527 - 536 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cary, NC
Oxford University Press
15.03.2004
Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A C-to-T polymorphism in exon 2 of the cathepsin D gene encoding cathepsin D (CTSD) has been implicated as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. The authors performed a meta-analysis of 14 studies (16 comparisons) with CTSD genotyping (3,174 Alzheimer’s disease cases and 3,298 controls). Overall, the random effects odds ratio for the T versus the C allele was 1.17 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95, 1.44), with some between-study heterogeneity (p < 0.01). There was significant between-study heterogeneity but no evidence of a significant association when the first hypothesis-generating study was excluded from the calculations (odds ratio (OR) = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.35; p = 0.29). The summary odds ratio for T carriers versus T noncarriers was similar in subjects carrying or not carrying an apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (APOE*4). The increased susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease conferred by APOE*4 carriage tended to be more prominent in the presence of the T allele (random effects OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 4.19, 8.79, and OR = 4.09, 95% CI: 3.15, 5.31, in T carriers and noncarriers, respectively). The meta-analysis shows that the CTSD polymorphism is not a major risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, although a small effect or an enhancement of the APOE*4 effect cannot be excluded. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Received for publication August 5, 2003; accepted for publication October 10, 2003. istex:050C073BE908F11B73AE02B15C590C8390E6083A ark:/67375/HXZ-1NQS1XLG-L local:kwh069 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-9262 1476-6256 0002-9262 |
DOI: | 10.1093/aje/kwh069 |