The use of multivariate regression analysis in contrast-detail studies of CT scanners

Previous studies of the imaging performance of computed tomography (CT) scanners, and other imaging modalities, have failed to apply appropriate statistical methods to data analysis, thus impairing the accuracy and significance of results. Given that imaging performance involves a number of interrel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 11; no. 4; p. 456
Main Author Trajtenberg, M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.1984
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies of the imaging performance of computed tomography (CT) scanners, and other imaging modalities, have failed to apply appropriate statistical methods to data analysis, thus impairing the accuracy and significance of results. Given that imaging performance involves a number of interrelated variables and an element of randomness, its empirical assessment requires multivariate regression analysis. This method is used here to analyze anew a set of contrast-detail data from a previous study on CT scanners. The main issues considered are the specification of the proper functional form linking perceptibility, dose and contrast, the estimation of the contrast and dose coefficients, and of scanner-specific constants to be used in computing indices of imaging quality. One of the main empirical findings is that the dose coefficient of the CT scanners studied is significantly less than that predicted by the theoretical model: 1/5 instead of 1/3. This result suggests that actual dose used in routine clinical studies could be reduced substantially without impairing much the quality of the images. On the other hand, the coefficient of contrast does correspond to its predicted value, i.e., 2/3. The methodology used here is not limited to the contrast-detail framework, but is applicable to, and indeed essential in, empirical studies of the performance of any imaging modality.
ISSN:0094-2405
DOI:10.1118/1.595537