An investigation of the performance consequences of alignment and adaptability: contingency effects of decision autonomy and shared responsibility

This research investigates the moderating role of organizations’ structural context on the performance outcomes of the firm's alignment and adaptability pursuits. It focuses in particular on the role of decision autonomy and shared responsibility, and posits that these structural features exert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inR & D management Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 14 - 30
Main Authors Thongpapanl, Narongsak (Tek), De Clercq, Dirk, Dimov, Dimo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This research investigates the moderating role of organizations’ structural context on the performance outcomes of the firm's alignment and adaptability pursuits. It focuses in particular on the role of decision autonomy and shared responsibility, and posits that these structural features exert opposing influences on the effect of alignment and adaptability on performance. Using a sample of more than 200 Canadian‐based firms, this study finds that at higher levels of decision autonomy, the positive relationship between alignment and performance becomes weaker, and the positive relationship between adaptability and performance becomes stronger. Furthermore, at higher levels of shared responsibility, the positive relationship between adaptability and performance strengthens. Thus, the study offers structure‐based explanations for the challenge that organizations face when they attempt to reap the benefits of alignment and adaptability simultaneously.
Bibliography:ArticleID:RADM666
ark:/67375/WNG-4KNVZSSG-C
istex:8F2A163C9AF7E7588973A68B84A3EEF20105FB56
ISSN:0033-6807
1467-9310
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00666.x