Vapour-liquid equilibria for (water+ethanol+fructose): Experimental data and thermodynamic modelling

•Vapour-liquid equilibria data for water+ethanol+fructose.•Role of fructose on the change of ethanol volatility.•Evaluation of available sugar specific group contribution method. Fructose (1,3,4,5,6-pentahydoxyhex-2-one) is an important sugar in the global market because of its unique characteristic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of chemical thermodynamics Vol. 115; pp. 27 - 33
Main Authors Dias, Rafael M., Chiavone-Filho, Osvaldo, Bernardo, André, Giulietti, Marco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Vapour-liquid equilibria data for water+ethanol+fructose.•Role of fructose on the change of ethanol volatility.•Evaluation of available sugar specific group contribution method. Fructose (1,3,4,5,6-pentahydoxyhex-2-one) is an important sugar in the global market because of its unique characteristics when compared to other sugars, which makes fructose economically attractive, even though it is not easily produced. Crystalline fructose may be produced by crystallization of its aqueous solution, with the addition of ethanol as anti-solvent. After the separation of the crystals, the recovery of (ethanol+water+fructose) mother-liquor becomes feasible. Then, a distillation step may recover ethanol, and vapour-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data for (water+ethanol+fructose) mixtures are consequently necessary, despite not being available in the literature. In this work, VLE results for (water+ethanol) and (water+ethanol+fructose) were determined using a modified ebulliometer based on vapour recirculation. VLE measurements for (water+ethanol) were used to verify the thermodynamic consistency applying the Global Area Test developed by Redlich-Kister-Herington. Group contribution activity coefficient models were selected and evaluated to predict VLE for the ternary system. S-UNIFAC, A-UNIFAC and mS-UNIFAC models were tested. mS-UNIFAC demonstrated the best results, with average absolute relative deviation between experimental data and values calculated from the model of 0.1%, 3.6%, 3.0% and 3.6% for mole fraction of ethanol vapour when 0, 10.3, 20.7 and 31.0mass percent of fructose were used.
ISSN:0021-9614
1096-3626
DOI:10.1016/j.jct.2017.07.021