Environmental Correlates of Recreational Walking in the Neighborhood

Purpose. To assess environmental correlates of neighborhood recreational walking. Design. The study used a cross-sectional survey. Setting. The study was conducted in the local community. Subjects. Participants were adults who recently relocated and walk for recreation in their current neighborhood....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of health promotion Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 139 - 148
Main Authors Nehme, Eileen K., Oluyomi, Abiodun O., Calise, Tamara Vehige, Kohl, Harold W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2016
American Journal of Health Promotion
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose. To assess environmental correlates of neighborhood recreational walking. Design. The study used a cross-sectional survey. Setting. The study was conducted in the local community. Subjects. Participants were adults who recently relocated and walk for recreation in their current neighborhood. Measures. The outcome measure was participant-reported neighborhood recreational walking in participants' prior neighborhood. Exposure measures were (1) participant-reported social and environmental characteristics of the prior neighborhood and (2) geographic information system–derived environmental characteristics assessed within a buffer around participant's prior address. Analysis. Participants reporting current neighborhood recreational walking (n = 231) were characterized by whether they walked for recreation in their prior neighborhood. Associations between neighborhood characteristics and neighborhood recreational walking were assessed using logistic regression. Results. Neighborhood recreational walking was associated with perceptions of the presence of recreational facilities (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29–4.84), interesting things to see (OR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.46–5.45), and others being active (OR = 3.56, 95% CI = 1.80–7.05), and was inversely associated with concerns about crime (OR= .40, 95% CI= .20–.77) and traffic (OR = .43, 95% CI = .22–.87). This behavior was associated with objectively measured presence of walking trails (OR = 3.58, 95% CI = 1.07–4.46), percentage of street length with speed limits ≤25 mph (OR= 1.31 for 10% increase, 95% CI= 1.08–1.61), and percentage of tree canopy coverage (OR= 1.55 for 10% increase, 95% CI = 1.12–2.14). Conclusion. Recreational walking may be influenced by environmental factors that support a safe, enjoyable, and social experience, attributes that are not necessarily prioritized in transportation walking. Outcome and exposure specificity are important when studying recreational walking.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0890-1171
2168-6602
2168-6602
DOI:10.4278/ajhp.130531-QUAN-281