Comparison of and comments on two thermodynamic approaches (reversible and irreversible) to ferroelectric phase transitions

In this article, we compared and commented on two thermodynamic approaches, i.e. the reversible and irreversible ones to ferroelectric phase transitions especially in the case of first-order. The reversible approach, otherwise known as the Landau-Devonshire theory proved not to possess a firm physic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhase transitions Vol. 81; no. 5; pp. 479 - 490
Main Authors Ai, Shu-Tao, Xu, Chang-Tan, Wang, Yong-Long, Zhang, Shao-Yin, Ning, Xue-Feng, Noll, Eli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.05.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this article, we compared and commented on two thermodynamic approaches, i.e. the reversible and irreversible ones to ferroelectric phase transitions especially in the case of first-order. The reversible approach, otherwise known as the Landau-Devonshire theory proved not to possess a firm physical basis according to the concepts and methods originating from the field theory and those originating from the analytical dynamics. The metastable states hypothesis underlying the Landau-Devonshire theory causes an unpleasant consequence and a logical conflict. As for the new-developed irreversible approach, we demonstrated that the fundamental hypothesis of stationary states underlying it, is reliable with the aid of non-equilibrium variational principles. The difficulties encountered within the Landau-Devonshire theory can be overcome while this approach is applied to the first-order ferroelectric phase transitions. There is some justification made to prove the proposition.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0141-1594
1029-0338
DOI:10.1080/01411590701877913