When the Walls Come Down: Evidence on Charter Schools’ Ability to Keep Their Best Teachers Without Unions and Certification Rules

Theories of market-based school reform suggest that teacher labor markets may be inefficient because schools lack autonomy to incentivize performance in hiring, retention, and compensation. We test this empirically by comparing teacher exits in the deregulated market of New Orleans with neighboring...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducational evaluation and policy analysis Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 283 - 312
Main Authors Barrett, Nathan, Carlson, Deven, Harris, Douglas N., Lincove, Jane Arnold
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.06.2022
American Educational Research Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Theories of market-based school reform suggest that teacher labor markets may be inefficient because schools lack autonomy to incentivize performance in hiring, retention, and compensation. We test this empirically by comparing teacher exits in the deregulated market of New Orleans with neighboring traditional school districts. We find that the relationship between teacher performance and retention is stronger in the deregulated market. We also find positive associations between salary and performance, but only when teachers transfer from one charter school to another. While teacher retention is more closely tied to performance in New Orleans, this did not yield a net gain in teacher quality, because new teachers in New Orleans were of lower average quality than their peers in neighboring districts.
ISSN:0162-3737
1935-1062
DOI:10.3102/01623737211047265