Venous thromboembolism in patients immobilised at home

The natural history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), its impact on outcome and the rationale for prophylaxis are well established for hospitalised, acutely ill medical patients [1-10], but are less clear for nonhospitalised immobilised patients. Current guidelines for antithrombotic therapy recommen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European respiratory journal Vol. 45; no. 6; pp. 1728 - 1731
Main Authors López-Reyes, Raquel, Nauffal, Dolores, Ballester, Marta, Martín-Antorán, José Manuel, de Sousa, Marta Saraiva, Riera-Mestre, Antoni, Ruiz-Ruiz, Justo, Fernández-Capitán, Carmen, Uresandi, Fernando, Monreal, Manuel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.06.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The natural history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), its impact on outcome and the rationale for prophylaxis are well established for hospitalised, acutely ill medical patients [1-10], but are less clear for nonhospitalised immobilised patients. Current guidelines for antithrombotic therapy recommend the use of prophylaxis in hospitalised, acutely ill medical patients, and suggest against its use in chronically immobilised persons at home and in patients with isolated lower-leg injuries requiring leg immobilisation [11]. However, there are no suggestions on the use of VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients immobilised at home.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0903-1936
1399-3003
DOI:10.1183/09031936.00220114