Soy lecithin as a potential alternative to powdered egg yolk for buck sperm cryopreservation does not protect them from mitochondrial damage

• Published in: Animal reproduction science Vol. 217; p. 106473
• Main Authors: Tabarez, Abigail, García, Wilber, Palomo, María Jesús
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.06.2020
• Subjects: Animals; BHT; Buck sperm; Butylated Hydroxytoluene; Cryopreservation; Cryopreservation - veterinary; Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology; Egg Yolk; Glycine max - chemistry; Goats; Lecithins; Male; Semen Preservation - veterinary; Soy lecithin; Soy lecithin; Cryopreservation; Buck sperm; BHT
• ISSN: 0378-4320; 1873-2232
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106473

•Soy lecithin as an alternative to egg yolk on buck sperm preservation•Negative effect of washing on motility parameters in sperm preserved in SL media•Low capacity of soy lecithin to protect sperm from mitochondrial membrane damage•Low beneficial effect was observed with BHT addition. The aim of this study was to address whether soy lecithin (SL) was an effective non-penetrating cryoprotectant for buck sperm cryopreservation in the presence of seminal plasma. There was also an attempt to determine the optimal concentration of BHT as an antioxidant in powdered egg yolk (PEY) or in SL based media. Two ejaculates were collected from six bucks and mixed ejaculates were aliquoted into washed, using centrifugation procedures, and unwashed samples. In Experiment 1, washed sperm were re-suspended in PEY (15%) or SL (1%) media, while unwashed semen was only diluted in SL medium. In Experiment 2, washed and unwashed sperm were diluted in PEY and SL media, respectively, with there being different BHT concentrations (0.6, 2.0 and 5.0 mM). In both experiments, after 4 h of refrigeration, there were no differences neither in sperm viability nor plasma membrane functional integrity (HOST) between groups when there were evaluations using eosin-nigrosine staining. After thawing, however, there was a negative effect on motility of washed sperm preserved in SL media. Furthermore, results from cytometry evaluations indicated there was a larger population of thawed sperm with intact plasma (SYBR-14+/PI-) and acrosome (PE-PNA-) membranes, but inactive mitochondria (Mitotracker deep red-) when SL media were used. When there was BHT supplementation, there was only a slight enhancement of motility of spermatozoa preserved in PEY media with 5 mM BHT. In conclusion, when effectiveness and efficiencies are considered, PEY is the non-penetrating cryoprotectant that should be utilized for buck sperm cryopreservation.