Analytical evaluation of the BioPlex® 2200 25-OH vitamin D total assay

Testing for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) has increased dramatically over the past decade and several automated immunoassays exist to measure serum 25(OH)D. Here we assess the performance of the recently released automated Bio-Rad BioPlex® 2200 25-OH vitamin D immunoassay, claimed to equally detect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical biochemistry Vol. 49; no. 9; pp. 723 - 725
Main Authors Abou El Hassan, Mohamed, Lin, Dan C.C., Earle, Tammy, Spencer, Megan, Blasutig, Ivan M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Testing for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) has increased dramatically over the past decade and several automated immunoassays exist to measure serum 25(OH)D. Here we assess the performance of the recently released automated Bio-Rad BioPlex® 2200 25-OH vitamin D immunoassay, claimed to equally detect 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3, and compare its results against a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method and the well-established DiaSorin LIAISON® 25-OH vitamin D total immunoassay. Imprecision was determined using third party controls over 20days. Linearity over the claimed measuring range was assessed using admixtures of a high and a low patient pool. Correlation between the BioPlex and LC–MS/MS (n=137) or the LIAISON (n=56) was assessed using patient samples with varying amounts of 25(OH)D3 and/or 25(OH)D2. The total imprecision was 9.4%, 6.9% and 4.5% at concentrations of 39.4nmol/L, 70.6nmol/L and 242.8nmol/L, respectively. The assay was linear from 33.1–375.0nmol/L with a R2 of 0.993. Method comparison revealed a strong correlation between the BioPlex assay and LC–MS/MS for samples containing 25(OH)D2 alone (n=5; R2=0.999), 25(OH)D3 alone (n=119; R2=0.935) and both (n=13; R2=0.919). In samples tested by all three methods (n=56), the correlation between the BioPlex and the LIAISON (R2=0.853) was poorer than that of the BioPlex and LC–MS/MS (R2=0.942). The BioPlex assay is suitable for the measurement of total serum 25(OH)D. The strong correlation between the BioPlex assay and LC–MS/MS in detecting 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 provides evidence that the BioPlex assay is capable of the equivalent detection of both forms. [Display omitted] •We assess the performance of the Bio-Rad BioPlex® 2200 25-OH vitamin D immunoassay.•The assay demonstrates good correlation to LC–MS/MS.•The assay is able to equally detect both D2 and D3 forms of vitamin D.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-9120
1873-2933
DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.03.010