Retheorising distributed leadership through epistemic injustice

Existing distributed leadership (DL) theories tend to focus on distributing financial, material and human resources in order to enhance school performance. However, their impact appears controversial. Critical scholars assert that using DL to promote trust and democracy can be a self-fulfilling prop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducational management, administration & leadership Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 774 - 790
Main Authors Tian, Meng, Nutbrown, Graham
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.07.2023
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Administrator Role
Cultural Influences
Democracy
Educational Improvement
Epistemology
Injustice
Instructional Leadership
Knowledge Level
Leadership Responsibility
Leadership Styles
Participative Decision Making
Power Structure
Principals
Social Bias
Social Influences
Social Justice
Teacher Role
Trust (Psychology)
epistemic (in)justice
hermeneutical injustice
systemic injustice
Distributed leadership
power
testimonial injustice
knowledge
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Existing distributed leadership (DL) theories tend to focus on distributing financial, material and human resources in order to enhance school performance. However, their impact appears controversial. Critical scholars assert that using DL to promote trust and democracy can be a self-fulfilling prophecy orchestrated by few formal leaders. When being misused as a managerial tool, DL can reinforce epistemic injustice in school. In this conceptual paper, we retheorise DL through the lens of epistemic injustice. Drawing on the concepts of testimonial, hermeneutical and systemic injustice, we analyse how DL practices potentially marginalise, silence, and reject individuals as knowledge contributors due to their deflated credibility, the lack of concepts or language, and systemic discrimination. To build epistemic justice and reciprocity into DL, we propose three moves: building trust and self-trust; re-distributing epistemic resources; and reconfiguring relational justice. This paper makes a theoretical contribution by explicating why and how epistemic injustice is done to disadvantaged individuals in DL. It also serves as the theoretical foundation for future empirical investigations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1741-1432
1741-1440
DOI:10.1177/17411432211022776