Regional Anaesthesia for Lower Extremity Amputation is Associated with Reduced Post-operative Complications Compared with General Anaesthesia

• Published in: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 476 - 484
• Main Authors: Mufarrih, Syed Hamza, Qureshi, Nada Qaisar, Schaefer, Maximilian S., Sharkey, Aidan, Fatima, Huma, Chaudhary, Omar, Krumm, Santiago, Baribeau, Vincent, Mahmood, Feroze, Schermerhorn, Marc, Matyal, Robina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.09.2021
• Subjects: General anaesthesia; Lower extremity amputation; Pulmonary complications; Regional anaesthesia; General anaesthesia; Pulmonary complications; Regional anaesthesia; Lower extremity amputation
• ISSN: 1078-5884; 1532-2165
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.040

Primary and secondary lower extremity amputation, performed for patients with lower extremity arterial disease, is associated with increased post-operative morbidity. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of regional anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on post-operative pulmonary complications. A retrospective analysis of 45 492 patients undergoing lower extremity amputation between 2005 and 2018 was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Safety Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to assess differences in primary outcome of post-operative pulmonary complications (pneumonia or respiratory failure requiring re-intubation) within 48 hours and 30 days after surgery between patients receiving regional (RA) or general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes included post-operative blood transfusion, septic shock, re-operation, and post-operative death within 30 days. Of 45 492 patients, 40 026 (88.0%) received GA and 5 466 (12.0%) RA. Patients who received GA had higher odds of developing pulmonary complications at 48 hours (2.1% vs. 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 – 1.78; p = .007) and within 30 days (6.3% vs. 5.9%; aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 – 1.78; p = .039). The odds of blood transfusions (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 – 1.21; p = .017), septic shock (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 – 1.60; p = .025) and re-operation (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03 – 1.53; p = .023) were also higher for patients who received GA vs. patients who received RA. No difference in mortality rate was observed between patients who received GA and those who received RA (5.7% vs. 7.1%; odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 – 1.07). A statistically significant reduction in pulmonary complications was observed in patients who received RA for lower extremity amputation compared with GA.