Genuine Concern for Animals in England's Nineteenth-Century Animal Protection Movement: The Case Against Reductionist Interpretations

• Published in: Law and History Review Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 217 - 224
• Main Author: Fernandez, Angela
• Format: Journal Article Book Review
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.02.2023
• Subjects: 19th century; Agribusiness; Animal welfare; Attitudes; Cruelty to animals; History; Political activism; Review Essay; Society; Women; UNITED KINGDOM; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 0738-2480; 1939-9022
• DOI: 10.1017/S073824802300024X

Animal–human history is an increasingly popular area of historical research.1 Diana Donald's 2020 book, Women Against Cruelty: Protection of Animals in Nineteenth-Century Britain is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of animal protection and the role women have played in moral reform movements. Starting from the premise that the prevention of cruelty to animals is “a pure product of the nineteenth century” (p. 7), this dazzling book takes its reader through a wide range of important topics such as the early history of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), differences between men and women's attitudes toward animals, and the role women played in humane education.2 This review will particularly highlight the way that Donald consistently attacks reductionist theses that discount the genuine concern women had for animals in the nineteenth-century British animal protection movement, and how her interpretations consistently refocus our attention on historical evidence of that genuine concern.