Nomogram to Predict Distant Metastasis Probability for Pathological Complete Response Rectal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy [Corrigendum]

Jiang T, Liu S, Wu X, et al. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:4751-4761. Table 2 Distant metastasis events in 28 patients The authors have advised Table 2 on page 4755 is incorrect. The correct table is as follows. Furthermore, page 4755, left column, second paragraph, the text "The median DMFS of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer management and research Vol. 14; pp. 2533 - 2534
Main Authors Jiang, Ting, Liu, Shuang, Wu, Xiaojun, Liu, Xiaoqing, Li, Weizhan, Yang, Shanfei, Cai, Peiqiang, Xi, Shaoyan, Zeng, Zhifan, Gao, Yuanhong, Chen, Gong, Xiao, Weiwei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Macclesfield Dove Medical Press Limited 31.08.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dove
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Jiang T, Liu S, Wu X, et al. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:4751-4761. Table 2 Distant metastasis events in 28 patients The authors have advised Table 2 on page 4755 is incorrect. The correct table is as follows. Furthermore, page 4755, left column, second paragraph, the text "The median DMFS of these 28 patients was 13.4 months (0.93-62.57 months) (Table 2). The 1-year, 3-year, 5-year DMFS was 95.0%, 89.6%, 88.9%, respectively. Metastatic organs included 1 with bone, 1 with liver, 10 with lung and 16 with multiple metastases to lymph nodes, as we shown in Table 2" should read "The median DMFS of these 28 patients was 13.4 months (0.93-62.57 months). The 1-year, 3-year, 5-year DMFS was 95.0%, 89.6%, 88.9%, respectively. Metastatic organs included 2 with bone, 2 with liver, 12 with lung and 15 with multiple metastases to lymph nodes, as shown in Table 2". The authors advise these errors do not affect the previously shown results and conclusion of the paper and apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
ISSN:1179-1322
1179-1322
DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S385626