Colonies as byproducts of commodity selection
When ecologists examine a colony, they tend to ask, what are the benefits of breeding in aggregations? In contrast, when students of leks examine an arena of displaying males, they usually ask, what are the mechanisms that produce aggregations? Here we discuss the differences in these two approaches...
Saved in:
Published in | Behavioral ecology Vol. 11; no. 5; pp. 572 - 573 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01.09.2000
Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | When ecologists examine a colony, they tend to ask, what are the benefits of breeding in aggregations? In contrast, when students of leks examine an arena of displaying males, they usually ask, what are the mechanisms that produce aggregations? Here we discuss the differences in these two approaches. The value of this distinction stems from the frustrating inability of decades of research to provide a general explanation of the widespread occurrence of colonial breeding. The traditional approach to studying coloniality is the measurement of costs and benefits of breeding in high density. Our aim is to illustrate how individuals can pursue adaptive strategies that result in their joining breeding aggregations without necessarily obtaining net benefits from the aggregation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:61CE435C0C1F269D71C52DD565CC3B347CD738D9 ark:/67375/HXZ-W70P42D9-9 local:0110572 PII:1465-7279 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1045-2249 1465-7279 1465-7279 |
DOI: | 10.1093/beheco/11.5.572 |