Colonies as byproducts of commodity selection

When ecologists examine a colony, they tend to ask, what are the benefits of breeding in aggregations? In contrast, when students of leks examine an arena of displaying males, they usually ask, what are the mechanisms that produce aggregations? Here we discuss the differences in these two approaches...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioral ecology Vol. 11; no. 5; pp. 572 - 573
Main Authors Wagner, Richard H., Danchin, Etienne, Boulinier, Thierry, Helfenstein, Fabrice
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.09.2000
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:When ecologists examine a colony, they tend to ask, what are the benefits of breeding in aggregations? In contrast, when students of leks examine an arena of displaying males, they usually ask, what are the mechanisms that produce aggregations? Here we discuss the differences in these two approaches. The value of this distinction stems from the frustrating inability of decades of research to provide a general explanation of the widespread occurrence of colonial breeding. The traditional approach to studying coloniality is the measurement of costs and benefits of breeding in high density. Our aim is to illustrate how individuals can pursue adaptive strategies that result in their joining breeding aggregations without necessarily obtaining net benefits from the aggregation.
Bibliography:istex:61CE435C0C1F269D71C52DD565CC3B347CD738D9
ark:/67375/HXZ-W70P42D9-9
local:0110572
PII:1465-7279
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1045-2249
1465-7279
1465-7279
DOI:10.1093/beheco/11.5.572