Prevalence of Rape Myths in Headlines and Their Effects on Attitudes Toward Rape

The present research investigated the prevalence and effects of rape myths in newspaper headlines. In study 1, a content analysis of online news headlines from US media ( N  = 555) surrounding the 2003–2004 Kobe Bryant sexual assault case showed that 10% endorsed a rape myth. In study 2, students at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSex roles Vol. 58; no. 11-12; pp. 790 - 801
Main Authors Franiuk, Renae, Seefelt, Jennifer L., Vandello, Joseph A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.06.2008
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The present research investigated the prevalence and effects of rape myths in newspaper headlines. In study 1, a content analysis of online news headlines from US media ( N  = 555) surrounding the 2003–2004 Kobe Bryant sexual assault case showed that 10% endorsed a rape myth. In study 2, students at a mid-sized university in the mid-western USA ( N  = 154) read headlines endorsing or not endorsing rape myths. Male participants exposed to myth-endorsing headlines were (a) less likely to think Bryant was guilty than those exposed to non-myth headlines, (b) more likely to hold rape-supportive attitudes than those exposed to non-myth headlines, and (c) more likely to hold rape-supportive attitudes than were female participants exposed to myth-endorsing headlines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0360-0025
1573-2762
DOI:10.1007/s11199-007-9372-4