Wetland Classification Using Multi-Source and Multi-Temporal Optical Remote Sensing Data in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) is the only province in Atlantic Canada that does not have a wetland inventory system. As a consequence, both classifying and monitoring wetland areas are necessary for wetland conservation and human services in the province. In this study, wetlands in 5 pilot sites, d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCanadian journal of remote sensing Vol. 43; no. 4; pp. 360 - 373
Main Authors Amani, Meisam, Salehi, Bahram, Mahdavi, Sahel, Granger, Jean Elizabeth, Brisco, Brian, Hanson, Alan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis 04.07.2017
Taylor & Francis Group
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) is the only province in Atlantic Canada that does not have a wetland inventory system. As a consequence, both classifying and monitoring wetland areas are necessary for wetland conservation and human services in the province. In this study, wetlands in 5 pilot sites, distributed across NL, were classified using multi-source and multi-temporal optical remote sensing images. The procedures involved the application of an object-based method to segment and classify the images. To classify the areas, 5 different machine learning algorithms were examined. The results showed that the Random Forest (RF) algorithm in combination with an object-based approach was the most accurate method to classify wetlands. The average producer and user accuracies of wetland classes considering all pilot sites were 68% and 73%, respectively. The overall classification accuracies, which considered the accuracy of all wetland and non-wetland classes varied from 86% to 96% across all pilot sites confirming the robustness of the methodology despite the biological, ecological, and geographical differences among the study areas. Additionally, we assessed the effects of the tuning parameters on the accuracy of results, as well as the difference between pixel-based and object-based methods for wetland classification in this study.
ISSN:0703-8992
1712-7971
DOI:10.1080/07038992.2017.1346468