Decontamination of nuclear graphite
Graphite is used in gas-cooled reactors (e.g. AGR, MAGNOX, HTR) and Russian RMBK reactors as a moderator and reflector. About 250,000 Mg of irradiated graphite (i-graphite) has to be considered as radioactive waste in the next few centuries. Fission products and activation of impurities in the graph...
Saved in:
Published in | Nuclear engineering and design Vol. 238; no. 11; pp. 3086 - 3091 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.11.2008
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Graphite is used in gas-cooled reactors (e.g. AGR, MAGNOX, HTR) and Russian RMBK reactors as a moderator and reflector. About 250,000
Mg of irradiated graphite (i-graphite) has to be considered as radioactive waste in the next few centuries. Fission products and activation of impurities in the graphite contaminate this graphite during reactor operation. Key nuclides for waste management are Co-60 during decommissioning, if decommissioning is performed immediately after reactor shutdown, and the long living radionuclides
14C and
36Cl for long-term safety in the case of direct disposal. Most radioisotopes can, in principle, be removed by using the purification methods already applied during the manufacture of nuclear graphite. However, due to the same chemical behaviour as
12C, this does not seem to be applicable to
14C.
Contaminated graphite cannot be stored in low-level surface disposal facilities such as Centre de L’Aube, in France, due to the long half-life of
14C [Millington, D.N., Sneyers, A., Mouliney, M.H., Abram, T., Brücher, H., 2006. Report on the International Regulation as regards HTR/VHTR Waste Management, Deliverable D-BF1.1 of the Raphael Project, EC Contract 516508, Confidential report]. Furthermore, the
14C activity of the graphite reflectors from the two German HTR reactors (AVR and THTR) would amount to more than 90% of the total
14C activity licensed for the underground disposal site Konrad in Germany for non-heat-generating radioactive waste [Brennecke, P., October 1993. Anforderungen an endzulagernde radioaktive Abfälle (Vorläufige Endlagerbedingungen, Stand: April 1990 in der Fassung vom Oktober 1993) – Schachtanlage Konrad –, BfS-ET-3/90-REV-2, Salzgitter, p. 51].
The burning of nuclear graphite would be an efficient method for volume reduction, but would not be accepted by the public as long as all the
14C were emitted into the atmosphere in the form of CO
2. The required separation of the
14C from the off-gas is difficult and not economic because this carbon isotope has the same chemical properties as the
12C from the graphite matrix. The solidification of the whole amount of CO
2 would cancel out the volume reduction advantage of burning.
Thus, a process is required which benefits from the inhomogeneous distribution of the
14C in the graphite matrix leading to
14C-enriched and
14C-depleted off gas streams (Schmidt, P.C., 1979. Alternativen zur Verminderung der C-14-Emission bei der Wiederaufarbeitung von HTR-Brennelementen, JÜL-1567].
Tritium and other radioisotopes, including
36Cl and
129I, can be removed from graphite by thermal treatment. Even significant parts of the
14C inventory can be selectively extracted because most of the
14C may be adsorbed on the surface of the crystallites in the pore structure and not integrated into the crystal lattice. This has recently been demonstrated in principle by the HTR-N/N1 project. As an accompaniment to thermal treatments, steam reforming is an alternative method for decontaminating graphite from radionuclides. The decontamination rates are even higher in comparison to pure thermal treatment in an inert atmosphere, as was first evidenced by basic experiments in the HTR-N/N1 project. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-2 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Conference Paper-1 content type line 23 SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1 ObjectType-Article-3 |
ISSN: | 0029-5493 1872-759X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.02.010 |