Diversified Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 nanoparticles from birnessite towards application specificity and enhancement in lithium-ion batteries

•Three types of Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 were synthesized from birnessite.•Morphologies of the types heavily influenced their electrochemical performance.•The sample composed of nano-sized particles delivered 136.4mAhg−1 at 7C rate.•We investigated the transformation of crystallinity and morphology in calc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of alloys and compounds Vol. 604; pp. 217 - 225
Main Authors Wang, Haohe, Li, Xiaowei, Zhou, Qun, Ming, Hai, Adkins, J., Jin, Lingling, Jia, Zhenyong, Fu, Yu, Zheng, Junwei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 15.08.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Three types of Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 were synthesized from birnessite.•Morphologies of the types heavily influenced their electrochemical performance.•The sample composed of nano-sized particles delivered 136.4mAhg−1 at 7C rate.•We investigated the transformation of crystallinity and morphology in calcination.•Sodium ions doped in the structure may reduce its charge and discharge capacity. In the present work, three types of Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 were synthesized from sodium birnessite (NaBir) and each type exhibited distinct morphological features created by varying preparation (with or without ball milling) or varying the sequential order of the preparation steps. Three processes were employed, including (1) ion-exchange, simply mechanical mixing, calcination (Without-BM), (2) ion-exchange, ball milling, calcination (EX-priority), (3) ball milling, ion-exchange, calcination (BM-priority). The three as-prepared sample types exhibited different performance characteristics, depending on their respective preparation processes. The “Without-BM” sample exhibited a reversible capacity of 240mAhg−1 between 2.0V and 4.8V with a current density of 0.1C (30mAg−1), having almost no capacity fading after 80cycles. The “EX-priority” sample exhibited a desirable rate performance with a reversible capacity of 213.4mAhg−1 at 1C and 136.4mAhg−1 at 7C; however, the capacity retention was 88.3% after 80cycles at 0.1C. The “BM-priority” sample displayed a moderate rate and cycle performance. The differences between these samples demonstrated that the ball milling treatment and its sequence have substantial effects on performance of materials. The experimental data indicated that the different performances can be attributed to the different morphologies of the respective materials as well as the effect of sodium ion concentration within the structure. Therefore, controlling the morphology of the material and the amount of sodium ions in its structure may be advantageous for developing high quality cathode materials which can be diversified for specific applications in Li-ion batteries.
ISSN:0925-8388
1873-4669
DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.101