Diagnosis of mesenteric panniculitis in the multi-detector computed tomography era. Association with malignancy and surgical history

To assess the prevalence and associations of mesenteric panniculitis (MP) using multi-detector CT (MDCT). This retrospective study included 4758 consecutive patients who underwent abdomino-pelvic MDCT between January 2012 and December 2014 at Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan. Radiological d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSaudi medical journal Vol. 38; no. 10; pp. 1013 - 1018
Main Authors Mahafza, Waleed S, Manzalawi, Karam A, Gharaibeh, Azza A, Khayat, Omar W, Shahait, Awni, Juweid, Malik E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Saudi Arabia Saudi Medical Journal 01.10.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess the prevalence and associations of mesenteric panniculitis (MP) using multi-detector CT (MDCT). This retrospective study included 4758 consecutive patients who underwent abdomino-pelvic MDCT between January 2012 and December 2014 at Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan. Radiological database was searched for MP diagnosis and patients with suspected MP were re-evaluated by an experienced radiologist to confirm the diagnosis. Data on all patients with confirmed MP diagnosis were subsequently collected and analyzed. Computed tomography features of MP were identified in 90 patients (41 males, 49 females), a prevalence of 1.9%. Mesenteric panniculitis was identified in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Malignancy was found in 28 MP patients (31%) and 44 of the MP patients (49%) had prior history of abdomino-pelvic surgery. Mesenteric panniculitis was significantly more frequently associated with prior abdomino-pelvic surgery (p=0.0001) and the likelihood of associated malignancy in patients with MP was 2.1-fold higher than in patients without MP (p=0.0013). Conclusion: Mesenteric panniculitis can be reliably diagnosed by MDCT due to its typical CT appearance. Its identification is important because of its significant association with malignancy and because it represents one of the differential diagnoses in patients with nonspecific symptoms referred for abdomino-pelvic CT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0379-5284
1658-3175
DOI:10.15537/smj.2017.10.20163