After initial acquisition, problem-solving leads to better long-term performance than example study, even for complex tasks

Successful implementation of effective acquisition strategies (e.g., example study, problem-solving) could help improve mathematics performance. However, it is not yet fully understood when each acquisition strategy should be used, despite the practical value of this knowledge for mathematics textbo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLearning and instruction Vol. 95; p. 102027
Main Authors Ruitenburg, Sterre K., Ackermans, Kevin, Kirschner, Paul A., Jarodzka, Halszka, Camp, Gino
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0959-4752
DOI10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102027

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Successful implementation of effective acquisition strategies (e.g., example study, problem-solving) could help improve mathematics performance. However, it is not yet fully understood when each acquisition strategy should be used, despite the practical value of this knowledge for mathematics textbook authors, teachers, and students. Building upon two recent perspectives on when example study and problem-solving are beneficial, we proposed that the optimal acquisition strategy could depend on both task complexity and retention interval (i.e., time between the final practice opportunity and the test). We conducted a multi-classroom experiment to test this proposition. 166 typically-developing Dutch fifth-grade students participated (Mage = 11.14 years; 42.2% boys). We used a 2 (Task Complexity: simple vs. complex) x 2 (Acquisition Strategy: example study vs. problem-solving) x 2 (Retention Interval: 5 min vs. 1 week) between-subjects design with problem-solving performance as dependent variable. There was no evidence for the hypothesised three-way interaction effect of task complexity, acquisition strategy, and retention interval. However, there was evidence for the hypothesised two-way interaction effect of acquisition strategy and retention interval, independent of task complexity. More specifically, after 5 min, there was no statistically significant performance difference between students studying worked examples and those solving practice problems, but after 1 week, students solving practice problems outperformed those studying worked examples. Our findings imply that, after initial acquisition, problem-solving leads to better long-term problem-solving performance than example study. This holds true even for a relatively complex task and with limited instruction. •The effect of acquisition strategy on performance depended on retention interval.•After initial acquisition, problem-solving led to better long-term performance.•This held true even for a relatively complex task and with limited instruction.
ISSN:0959-4752
DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102027