Primary care physicians and children's blood cholesterol

Background. In a national survey sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 62% of primary care physicians of children (under age 18 years) believed that high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in childhood had a great effect on subsequent heart disease risk. Results. Abo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPreventive medicine Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 191 - 202
Main Authors Kimm, Sue Y.S., Payne, Gerald H., Lakatos, Edward, Webber, Larry S., Greenblatt, Janice
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. In a national survey sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 62% of primary care physicians of children (under age 18 years) believed that high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in childhood had a great effect on subsequent heart disease risk. Results. About 75% believed high blood pressure, smoking, and diabetes had similar effects. Although routine cholesterol screening in children under age 10 was infrequent, 72% of physicians screened high risk children. The age at which screening was done varied markedly; more pediatricians screened children younger than 5 years. The majority of physicians who saw children with high blood cholesterol instituted nondrug therapy, with pediatricians being most apt to do so. Low saturated fat diets were prescribed by 26% of these physicians and 9% of physicians prescribed increased polyunsaturated diets. Twelve percent of physicians treating hypercholesterolemic children used lipid-lowering drugs. Among those using drugs, 9% based drug use on total blood cholesterol measurements only. Factors that affected physician treatment of childhood hypercholesterolemia included physician specialty type, organization of practice (group or solo), and the age distribution of the pediatric patient population.
Bibliography:S30
S01
9181875
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0091-7435
1096-0260
DOI:10.1016/0091-7435(92)90018-D