Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures
One hundred thirty-one patients (135 fractures) who sustained an intertrochanteric fracture were assigned randomly to treatment with either a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary hip screw and followed up prospectively. In patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, the intramedullary devi...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical orthopaedics and related research no. 348; p. 87 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.03.1998
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | One hundred thirty-one patients (135 fractures) who sustained an intertrochanteric fracture were assigned randomly to treatment with either a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary hip screw and followed up prospectively. In patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, the intramedullary device was associated with 23% less surgical time and 44% less blood loss; however, use of the intramedullary hip screw in patients who had a stable fracture pattern required 70% greater fluoroscopic time. Intraoperative complications occurred exclusively in patients in the intramedullary hip screw group. There were no differences in the rates of functional recovery between the two fixation groups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-921X |
DOI: | 10.1097/00003086-199803000-00015 |