Optimizing pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--practical issues: a Canadian Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) participation is the standard of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who remain symptomatic despite bronchodilator therapies. However, there are questions about specific aspects of PR programming including optimal site of rehabilitation d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCanadian respiratory journal Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 159 - 168
Main Authors Marciniuk, Darcy D, Brooks, Dina, Butcher, Scott, Debigare, Richard, Dechman, Gail, Ford, Gordon, Pepin, Veronique, Reid, Darlene, Sheel, Andrew W, Stickland, Micheal K, Todd, David C, Walker, Shannon L, Aaron, Shawn D, Balter, Meyer, Bourbeau, Jean, Hernandez, Paul, Maltais, Francois, O'Donnell, Denis E, Bleakney, Donna, Carlin, Brian, Goldstein, Roger, Muthuri, Stella K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Egypt Pulsus Group Inc 01.07.2010
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) participation is the standard of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who remain symptomatic despite bronchodilator therapies. However, there are questions about specific aspects of PR programming including optimal site of rehabilitation delivery, components of rehabilitation programming, duration of rehabilitation, target populations and timing of rehabilitation. The present document was compiled to specifically address these important clinical issues, using an evidence-based, systematic review process led by a representative interprofessional panel of experts. The evidence reveals there are no differences in major patient-related outcomes of PR between nonhospital- (community or home sites) or hospital-based sites. There is strong support to recommend that COPD patients initiate PR within one month following an acute exacerbation due to benefits of improved dyspnea, exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life relative to usual care. Moreover, the benefits of PR are evident in both men and women, and in patients with moderate, severe and very severe COPD. The current review also suggests that longer PR programs, beyond six to eight weeks duration, be provided for COPD patients, and that while aerobic training is the foundation of PR, endurance and functional ability may be further improved with both aerobic and resistance training.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-3
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-5
ObjectType-Undefined-1
Member, Canadian Thoracic Society COPD Executive Committee
Chair, Canadian Thoracic Society COPD Committee
Expert Reviewer
ISSN:1198-2241
1916-7245
DOI:10.1155/2010/425975