Response to growth hormone treatment in very young patients with growth hormone deficiencies and mini-puberty

The aim of the study was to assess the response to growth hormone (GH) treatment in very young patients with GH deficiency (GHD) through a national, multi-center study. Possible factors affecting growth response were assessed (especially mini-puberty). Medical reports of GHD patients in whom treatme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 175 - 184
Main Authors Çetinkaya, Semra, Poyrazoğlu, Şükran, Baş, Firdevs, Ercan, Oya, Yıldız, Metin, Adal, Erdal, Bereket, Abdullah, Abalı, Saygın, Aycan, Zehra, Erdeve, Şenay Savaş, Berberoğlu, Merih, Şıklar, Zeynep, Tayfun, Meltem, Darcan, Şükran, Mengen, Eda, Bircan, İffet, Jones, Filiz Mine Çizmecioğlu, Şimşek, Enver, Papatya, Esra Deniz, Özbek, Mehmet Nuri, Bolu, Semih, Abacı, Ayhan, Büyükinan, Muammer, Darendeliler, Feyza
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany De Gruyter 26.01.2018
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of the study was to assess the response to growth hormone (GH) treatment in very young patients with GH deficiency (GHD) through a national, multi-center study. Possible factors affecting growth response were assessed (especially mini-puberty). Medical reports of GHD patients in whom treatment was initiated between 0 and 3 years of age were retrospectively evaluated. The cohort numbered 67. The diagnosis age was 12.4±8.6 months, peak GH stimulation test response (at diagnosis) as 1.0±1.4 ng/mL. The first and second years length gain was 15.0±4.3 and 10.4±3.4 cm. Weight gain had the largest effect on first year growth response; whereas weight gain and GH dose were both important factors affecting second year growth response. In the multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) group (n=50), first year GH response was significantly greater than in the isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) group (n=17) (p=0.030). In addition first year growth response of infants starting GH between 0 and 12 months of age (n=24) was significantly greater than those who started treatment between 12 and 36 months of age (n=43) (p<0.001). These differences were not seen in the second year. Δ Length/height standard deviation score (SDS), Δ body weight SDS, length/height SDS, weight SDS in MPHD without hypogonadism for the first year of the GH treatment were found as significantly better than MPHD with hypogonadism. Early onsets of GH treatment, good weight gain in the first year of the treatment and good weight gain-GH dose in the second year of the treatment are the factors that have the greatest effect on length gain in early onset GHD. The presence of the sex steroid hormones during minipubertal period influence growth pattern positively under GH treatment (closer to the normal percentage according to age and gender).
ISSN:0334-018X
2191-0251
DOI:10.1515/jpem-2017-0123