Psychometric Evaluation of Work-Family Conflict Measures Using Classic Test and Item Response Theories

• Published in: Journal of business and psychology Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 117 - 138
• Main Authors: Min, Hanyi, Matthews, Russell A., Wayne, Julie Holliday, Parsons, Rachel E., Barnes-Farrell, Janet
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.02.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Behavioral Science and Psychology; Business and Management; Classical test theory; Community and Environmental Psychology; Conflict; Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Item response theory; Measurement; Occupational psychology; Original Paper; Personality and Social Psychology; Psychology; Quantitative psychology; Social Sciences; Work life balance; Item response theory; Work-family conflict measurement; Classical test theory
• ISSN: 0889-3268; 1573-353X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10869-019-09656-5

Work-family researchers have widely accepted Greenhaus and Beutell’s ( 1985 ) conceptualization of work-family conflict (WFC), but no such consensus has been reached regarding a standard operationalization. There are many existing WFC scales, yet no systematic comparison and understanding of potential overlap across those scales. We conduct two investigations of four existing WFC scales that differ in multiple characteristics (i.e., content domain, number of items, response scale). Results from study 1 ( N  = 605) suggest that while confirmatory factor analyses indicate that different scales relate to the same higher-order construct, the magnitude of relationship between WFC and its correlates systematically varies as a function of the scale under consideration. In addition to replicating these findings in study 2 ( N  = 583), we applied an item response theory approach to demonstrate that different scales provide different levels of measurement precision for respondents experiencing different levels of WFC. Collectively, our results suggest that scholars must be thoughtful when choosing their operationalization of WFC, recognizing they may observe meaningfully different results based on the scale used, particularly as a function of dominant characteristics within their sample.