Predictive Value of Beat-to-Beat QT Variability Index Across the Continuum of Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Competing Risks of Noncardiac or Cardiovascular Death and Sudden or Nonsudden Cardiac Death

BACKGROUND—The goal of the present study was to determine the predictive value of beat-to-beat QT variability in heart failure patients across the continuum of left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS—Beat-to-beat QT variability index (QTVI), log-transformed heart rate variance, normalized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 719 - 727
Main Authors Tereshchenko, Larisa G., Cygankiewicz, Iwona, McNitt, Scott, Vazquez, Rafael, Bayes-Genis, Antoni, Han, Lichy, Sur, Sanjoli, Couderc, Jean-Philippe, Berger, Ronald D., de Luna, Antoni Bayes, Zareba, Wojciech
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD American Heart Association, Inc 01.08.2012
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
ECG
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND—The goal of the present study was to determine the predictive value of beat-to-beat QT variability in heart failure patients across the continuum of left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS—Beat-to-beat QT variability index (QTVI), log-transformed heart rate variance, normalized QT variance, and coherence between heart rate variability and QT variability have been measured at rest during sinus rhythm in 533 participants of the Muerte Subita en Insuficiencia Cardiaca heart failure study (mean age, 63.1±11.7; men, 70.6%; left ventricular ejection fraction >35% in 254 [48%]) and in 181 healthy participants from the Intercity Digital Electrocardiogram Alliance database. During a median of 3.7 years of follow-up, 116 patients died, 52 from sudden cardiac death (SCD). In multivariate competing risk analyses, the highest QTVI quartile was associated with cardiovascular death (subhazard ratio, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.14–2.47]; P=0.009) and, in particular, with non-SCD (subhazard ratio, 2.91 [1.69–5.01]; P<0.001). Elevated QTVI separated 97.5% of healthy individuals from subjects at risk for cardiovascular (subhazard ratio, 1.57 [1.04–2.35]; P=0.031) and non-SCD in multivariate competing risk model (subhazard ratio, 2.58 [1.13–3.78]; P=0.001). No interaction between QTVI and left ventricular ejection fraction was found. QTVI predicted neither noncardiac death (P=0.546) nor SCD (P=0.945). Decreased heart rate variability rather than increased QT variability was the reason for increased QTVI in the present study. CONCLUSIONS—Increased QTVI because of depressed heart rate variability predicts cardiovascular mortality and non-SCD but neither SCD nor extracardiac mortality in heart failure across the continuum of left ventricular dysfunction. Abnormally augmented QTVI separates 97.5% of healthy individuals from heart failure patients at risk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1941-3149
1941-3084
1941-3084
DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.112.970541