Use of prescribed psychotropic drugs among medical students and associated factors: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUNDThe worldwide prevalences of anxiety and depressive disorders are 3.6% and 4.4%, respectively. Among medical students, many studies have indicated that the prevalences of these mental disorders vary between 19.7% and 47.1%, but there is a lack of information on psychotropic drug usage in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSão Paulo medical journal Vol. 140; no. 5; pp. 697 - 704
Main Authors Fasanella, Nicoli Abrão, Custódio, Clarissa Garcia, Cabo, Júlia Santos do, Andrade, Gabriel Sousa, Almeida, Fernando Antônio de, Pavan, Maria Valéria
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Published Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 12.08.2022
Associação Paulista de Medicina
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUNDThe worldwide prevalences of anxiety and depressive disorders are 3.6% and 4.4%, respectively. Among medical students, many studies have indicated that the prevalences of these mental disorders vary between 19.7% and 47.1%, but there is a lack of information on psychotropic drug usage in this group of students. OBJECTIVETo evaluate the prevalence of psychotropic drug use, adherence to therapy and main clinical and diagnostic indications relating to psychotropic drug use among medical students. DESIGN AND SETTINGCross-sectional study at a Brazilian private university in the city of Sorocaba, state of São Paulo. METHODSObservational analytical cross-sectional study, conducted during the second semester of 2019, through a semi-structured online questionnaire, answered by first to sixth-year medical students. RESULTSAmong the 263 participants (41.7% of the 630 enrolled students), the current prevalence of psychotropic drug usage was 30.4%. This prevalence increased over the course and 90.7% of the drugs were prescribed at regular medical consultations (85.5% by psychiatrists). The main indications for psychotropic drug usage were anxiety (30.0%), depression (22.8%), insomnia (7.2%), panic (5.3%) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (3.8%). Women were more likely to present diagnoses of depression and panic. Most of the participants used antidepressants and had good adherence to medications. Adequate sleep and regular physical activity were identified as protective factors against mental disorders. CONCLUSIONThe prevalence of mental disorders among medical students is high, which justifies the use of psychotropic drugs. This study provides valuable information and recommendations for institutional educational actions to improve students' mental health.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Authors’ contributions: Fasanella NA: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), resources (equal), software (equal), supervision (equal), validation (equal), visualization (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal); Custódio CG: conceptualization (equal), data curation (supporting), formal analysis (supporting), funding acquisition (supporting), investigation (supporting), methodology (supporting), project administration (supporting), resources (supporting), software (supporting), supervision (supporting), validation (supporting), visualization (supporting), writing-original draft (supporting) and writing-review and editing (supporting); do Cabo JS: conceptualization (supporting), data curation (supporting), formal analysis (supporting), funding acquisition (supporting), investigation (supporting), methodology (supporting), project administration (supporting), resources (supporting), software (supporting), supervision (supporting), validation (supporting), visualization (supporting), writing-original draft (supporting) and writing-review and editing (supporting); Andrade GS: conceptualization (supporting), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (supporting), investigation (supporting), methodology (supporting), project administration (supporting), resources (supporting), software (supporting), supervision (supporting), validation (supporting), visualization (supporting), writing-original draft (supporting) and writing-review and editing (supporting); Pavan MV: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (lead), methodology (equal), project administration (equal), resources (equal), software (equal), supervision (lead), validation (equal), visualization (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal); and Almeida FA: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (lead), methodology (equal), project administration (equal), resources (equal), software (equal), supervision (lead), validation (equal), visualization (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal)
Conflicts of interest: None
ISSN:1516-3180
1806-9460
1806-9460
DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0566.r2.05012022