Telemedicine Use Decreases the Carbon Footprint of the Bariatric Surgery Preoperative Evaluation

• Published in: Obesity surgery Vol. 33; no. 8; pp. 2527 - 2532
• Main Authors: Sillcox, Rachel, Blaustein, Megan, Khandelwal, Saurabh, Bryant, Mary Kate, Zhu, Jay, Chen, Judy Y
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.08.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Carbon dioxide; Carbon footprint; COVID-19; Gastrointestinal surgery; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Contributions; Pandemics; Surgery; Telemedicine; Telemedicine; Carbon footprint; Bariatric surgery; Attrition rate
• ISSN: 0960-8923; 1708-0428
• DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06721-0

Background Healthcare-associated activity accounts for 10% of the United States’ carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. Using telemedicine for bariatric surgery evaluations decreases emissions and reduces patient burden during the multiple required interdisciplinary visits. After adopting telemedicine during COVID, our clinic continues to utilize telemedicine for preoperative bariatric evaluations. We evaluated the reduced environmental impact associated with this practice. Methods A retrospective review of all new evaluations for vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2019 and 2021 was conducted. The 2019 year represents pre-pandemic, in-person evaluations and 2021 represents telemedicine evaluations during the COVID pandemic. Carbon emissions were calculated using the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) validated formula of 404g CO 2 per car-mile. Preoperative evaluation time was calculated from the initial clinic visit to the operation date. Results There were 51 patients in the 2019 cohort and 55 patients in the 2021 cohort. In the 2019 in-person cohort, there was significantly more kg of estimated CO 2 emitted (10,225 vs. 2011.4, p<. 001) compared to the 2021 cohort. For time required to complete the preoperative workup, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (162 days vs. 193 days, p= .226). The attrition rate was lower in the 2021 cohort (22.22% v. 35.9%, p <.001). Conclusions Implementation of telemedicine for bariatric preoperative evaluations reduced patient travel, carbon emissions, and improved attrition rate. We encourage bariatric providers to use telemedicine as we believe this eases patient burdens and, with wider adoption, could significantly reduce our carbon footprint. Graphical Abstract