Exergy analysis of two humidification process methods in air-conditioning systems

•Investigation new humidification method.•Exergy analysis technique for systems and processes that can be used to evaluate the distribution of availability losses in a system. Exergy analysis is a technique for systems and processes that can be used to evaluate the distribution of availability losse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy and buildings Vol. 124; pp. 129 - 140
Main Authors Ghazikhani, M., Khazaee, I., Vahidifar, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Investigation new humidification method.•Exergy analysis technique for systems and processes that can be used to evaluate the distribution of availability losses in a system. Exergy analysis is a technique for systems and processes that can be used to evaluate the distribution of availability losses in a system, so that measures and priorities with improvement potential can be developed. This article investigates the difference between the amount of exergy consumption and exergy loss (irreversibility) in the two methods of humidification, namely Constant Enthalpy Humidification (CEH) and Constant Temperature Humidification (CTH) in a Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system. In this work a 15×9×3m room with a 10000cfm Air Handling Unit (AHU), and a 30 and 25m of supply-and-return duct (30–25, respectively) are considered to investigate the exergy consumptions and irreversibilities of the components in the two humidification methods. The results show that the summation of irreversibilities in CEH is less than the CTH. In addition the power input of CEH in design condition is 12% less than the CTH, mostly due to large exergy consumption of the steam preparation in the humidification process. It can be concluded that CEH has superiority over the CTH due to less exergy consumption in the HVAC systems.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-7788
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.077