HPV as a Carcinomic Driver in Head and Neck Cancer: a De-escalated Future?
Opinion statement Patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have improved prognosis relatively to those with tumors not driven by HPV. Both definitive radiotherapy (typically with concurrent chemotherapy) and transoral robotic surgery (with adjuvant therapies based on pathol...
Saved in:
Published in | Current treatment options in oncology Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 325 - 332 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.03.2022
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Opinion statement
Patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have improved prognosis relatively to those with tumors not driven by HPV. Both definitive radiotherapy (typically with concurrent chemotherapy) and transoral robotic surgery (with adjuvant therapies based on pathologic risk factors) are both acceptable treatment options for patients. The decision on which treatment is optimal depends on individual patient factors and should be made in a multi-disciplinary setting with input from a radiation oncologist, head and neck surgeon, and medical oncologist. Where appropriate, patients in this setting should be considered for enrollment on clinical studies evaluating de-escalation of treatment intensity given the very favorable outcomes and high toxicity profile associated with conventional therapies. However, caution is needed given negative data for de-escalation in the definitive chemotherapy and radiation setting. It remains unclear what the prognostic significance of HPV status is in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck outside of the oropharynx. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 1527-2729 1534-6277 1534-5277 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11864-022-00950-8 |