HPV as a Carcinomic Driver in Head and Neck Cancer: a De-escalated Future?

Opinion statement Patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have improved prognosis relatively to those with tumors not driven by HPV. Both definitive radiotherapy (typically with concurrent chemotherapy) and transoral robotic surgery (with adjuvant therapies based on pathol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent treatment options in oncology Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 325 - 332
Main Authors Bates, James E., Steuer, Conor E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.03.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Opinion statement Patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have improved prognosis relatively to those with tumors not driven by HPV. Both definitive radiotherapy (typically with concurrent chemotherapy) and transoral robotic surgery (with adjuvant therapies based on pathologic risk factors) are both acceptable treatment options for patients. The decision on which treatment is optimal depends on individual patient factors and should be made in a multi-disciplinary setting with input from a radiation oncologist, head and neck surgeon, and medical oncologist. Where appropriate, patients in this setting should be considered for enrollment on clinical studies evaluating de-escalation of treatment intensity given the very favorable outcomes and high toxicity profile associated with conventional therapies. However, caution is needed given negative data for de-escalation in the definitive chemotherapy and radiation setting. It remains unclear what the prognostic significance of HPV status is in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck outside of the oropharynx.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1527-2729
1534-6277
1534-5277
DOI:10.1007/s11864-022-00950-8