Diagnostic performance of molecular imaging methods in predicting the progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia: an updated systematic review

• Published in: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging Vol. 51; no. 7; pp. 1876 - 1890
• Main Authors: Cotta Ramusino, Matteo, Massa, Federico, Festari, Cristina, Gandolfo, Federica, Nicolosi, Valentina, Orini, Stefania, Nobili, Flavio, Frisoni, Giovanni B., Morbelli, Silvia, Garibotto, Valentina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.06.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Accuracy; Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid; Atrophy; Biomarkers; Cardiology; Cognition; Cognitive ability; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging; Degeneration; Dementia; Dementia - diagnostic imaging; Dementia disorders; Disease Progression; Disorders; Epidemiology; Fluorine isotopes; Humans; Imaging; Imaging techniques; Impairment; Lewy bodies; Lewy body disease; Longitudinal studies; Medical diagnosis; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Molecular Imaging - methods; Nuclear Medicine; Oncology; Orthopedics; Positron emission tomography; Quality assessment; Quality control; Radiology; Review Article; Reviews; Scintigraphy; Single photon emission computed tomography; Systematic review; Tau protein; FDG-PET; Amyloid-PET; Mild cognitive impairment; Tau-PET; MIBG cardiac scintigraphy; DaT-SPECT
• ISSN: 1619-7070; 1619-7089; 1619-7089
• DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06631-y

Purpose Epidemiological and logistical reasons are slowing the clinical validation of the molecular imaging biomarkers in the initial stages of neurocognitive disorders. We provide an updated systematic review of the recent advances (2017–2022), highlighting methodological shortcomings. Methods Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy values of the molecular imaging techniques (i.e., amyloid-, tau-, [18F]FDG-PETs, DaT-SPECT, and cardiac [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy) in predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method and evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Main eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) ≥ 50 subjects with MCI, (2) follow-up ≥ 3 years, (3) gold standard: progression to dementia or diagnosis on pathology, and (4) measures of prospective accuracy. Results Sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) in predicting progression to dementia, mainly to Alzheimer’s dementia were 43–100% and 63–94% for [ 18 F]FDG-PET and 64–94% and 48–93% for amyloid-PET. Longitudinal studies were lacking for less common disorders (Dementia with Lewy bodies-DLB and Frontotemporal lobe degeneration-FTLD) and for tau-PET, DaT-SPECT, and [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy. Therefore, the accuracy values from cross-sectional studies in a smaller sample of subjects ( n  > 20, also including mild dementia stage) were chosen as surrogate outcomes. DaT-SPECT showed 47–100% SE and 71–100% SP in differentiating Lewy body disease (LBD) from non-LBD conditions; tau-PET: 88% SE and 100% SP in differentiating DLB from Posterior Cortical Atrophy. [ 123 I]-MIBG scintigraphy differentiated LBD from non-LBD conditions with 47–100% SE and 71–100% SP. Conclusion Molecular imaging has a moderate-to-good accuracy in predicting the progression of MCI to Alzheimer’s dementia. Longitudinal studies are sparse in non-AD conditions, requiring additional efforts in these settings.