Effects of the Topical Use of the Natural Antioxidant Alpha-Lipoic Acid on the Ocular Surface of Diabetic Patients with Dry Eye Symptoms

PURPOSEThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the treatment with eye-drops based on a combination of antioxidant and mucomimetic molecules, namely 0.1% alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) and 0.3% hydroxy-propyl-methylcellulose (HPMC) on the ocular surface of diabetic patients with dry eye s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in bioscience (Landmark. Print) Vol. 27; no. 7; p. 202
Main Authors Roszkowska, Anna M., Spinella, Rosaria, Oliverio, Giovanni W., Postorino, Elisa I., Signorino, Giuseppe A., Rusciano, Dario, Aragona, Pasquale
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IMR Press 27.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PURPOSEThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the treatment with eye-drops based on a combination of antioxidant and mucomimetic molecules, namely 0.1% alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) and 0.3% hydroxy-propyl-methylcellulose (HPMC) on the ocular surface of diabetic patients with dry eye symptoms. METHODSSeventy patients, 42 M and 28 F, aged from 50 to79 years (mean 62.1 ± 10.5), affected by type II diabetes mellitus, were enrolled and divided in two groups treated for 2 months as follows: Group 1 (35 patients), received topical ALA/HPMC three times a day, Group 2 (35 patients) received topical HPMC (0.3%) alone, three times a day. The main outcome measures were: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer I test, corneal sensitivity. An examination of tear film morphology with confocal microscopy was carried out in a subset of patients of each group at baseline and after two months. Statistical analysis was performed with t-test for the parametric data and Mann-Whitney U-test or chi-squared test for the nonparametric data. RESULTSBoth treatments resulted in significant improvements of BUT, OSDI and tear film morphology, although the improvements observed in group 1 showed a higher trend than what observed for group 2. Moreover, only in group 1 a significant improvement was visible for corneal staining, and no significant improvements were observed in any group for Schirmer I and sensitivity. CONCLUSIONSThese results confirmed the efficacy of HPMC in the treatment of diabetic dry eye and indicated that the addition of a strong self-regenerating antioxidant like ALA may give a distinctive advantage for the healing of corneal defects (as evidenced by corneal staining), beside improving HPMC efficacy on three other parameters (BUT, OSDI score, tear morphology). Therefore, the addition of a strong antioxidant like ALA can be helpful in preventing or treating ocular surface defects in diabetic patients, in which the oxidative damage is predominant.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2768-6701
2768-6698
DOI:10.31083/j.fbl2707202