Is laparoscopy needed for incarcerated hernias that became reducible during induction of general anesthesia?
The term acutely incarcerated abdominal wall hernia is used to define the acute onset of symptoms associated with local effects and mechanical bowel obstruction with or without strangulation.1 The major concern about incarceration as well as the major source of postoperative morbidity and mortality...
Saved in:
Published in | The American surgeon Vol. 81; no. 2; pp. E52 - 53 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
01.02.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The term acutely incarcerated abdominal wall hernia is used to define the acute onset of symptoms associated with local effects and mechanical bowel obstruction with or without strangulation.1 The major concern about incarceration as well as the major source of postoperative morbidity and mortality is the presence of strangulation. Because clinical and radiological evaluation is not reliable, direct visualization of the incarcerated organs by surgical exploration is mandatory. Patients with an inguinal hernia had a standard Lichtenstein procedure, whereas those with a femoral hernia had mesh plug repair in addition to the standard Lichtenstein procedure. Because our policy is to do a diagnostic laparoscopy in patients who undergo open hernia repair for an incarcerated groin hernia and in whom spontaneous reduction of an incarcerated hernia during the induction of general anesthesia without exception, only the patients who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair were excluded in the study. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
DOI: | 10.1177/000313481508100205 |