Behavioral activation versus cognitive restructuring to reduce automatic negative thoughts in anxiety generating situations

Recent studies have compared the efficacy of cognitive intervention compared to behavioral techniques for the treatment of different disorders. In line with that work, the empirical study presented here examined the efficacy of Behavioral Activation (BA) and Cognitive Therapy (CT) on Negative Automa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsicothema Vol. 2; no. 29; pp. 172 - 177
Main Authors Nieto Fernández, Elvira, Barraca Mairal, Jorge
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Spain Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos (PSICODOC) 01.05.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0214-9915
1886-144X
1886-144X
DOI10.7334/psicothema2016.325

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent studies have compared the efficacy of cognitive intervention compared to behavioral techniques for the treatment of different disorders. In line with that work, the empirical study presented here examined the efficacy of Behavioral Activation (BA) and Cognitive Therapy (CT) on Negative Automatic Thoughts (PANs) elicited in situations generating anxiety. Based on a sample of 42 students aged 18 to 21 who took the ISRA B, BADS and EROS, 18 subjects with the highest scores were selected and assigned at random to one of two experimental groups or to a control group. Experimental Group 1 was given intervention based on CT and Experimental Group 2 based on BA. Both interventions consisted of five 60-min sessions. Pre and post treatment measurement analyses reveal that both conditions effectively reduced the intensity of the anxiety response. However, BA was the only condition showing a significant reduction in ANTs. The results are discussed stressing the efficacy of BA in exclusively cognitive intervention.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0214-9915
1886-144X
1886-144X
DOI:10.7334/psicothema2016.325