Key Informants’ Perspectives on Implementing a Comprehensive Lung Cancer Screening Program in a Safety Net Healthcare System: Leadership, Successes, and Barriers

• Published in: Journal of cancer education Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 1144 - 1151
• Main Authors: Mejia, Maria C., Zoorob, Roger, Gonzalez, Sandra, Mosqueda, Maribel, Levine, Robert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.08.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Cancer; Cancer Research; Clinics; Evidence Based Practice; Evidence-based nursing; Health care policy; Health facilities; Health Services; Interviews; Lung cancer; Medical screening; Medicare; Mortality; Patients; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Physicians; Primary care; Public Health; Qualitative research; Resource Allocation; Screening Tests; Smoking cessation; Stakeholders; Success; Tobacco; Safety net system; Lung cancer screening; Program implementation; Tobacco cessation; Evidence-based practice
• ISSN: 0885-8195; 1543-0154
• DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01931-x

Implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in a safety net healthcare system is challenging. This study examined factors associated with feasibility and potential facilitators and barriers which might affect the implementation of a new evidence-based comprehensive primary care and community health–based program aiming to promote efficient and equitable delivery of Lung Cancer Screening and Tobacco Cessation (LCS-TC). Fifty-three key informants were interviewed. Informants discussed their perceptions of adoption of screening and appropriate referral practices across 15 community health centers. They also identified barriers and facilitators to implementing the LCS-TC program. Interview data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Three major themes representing facilitators and barriers were identified: (1) Allocation of resources and services coverage; (2) need for a collaborative process to engage stakeholders and identify champions; and (3) stakeholders need different types of evidence to support implementation. The top three activities identified as essential for success included provision of sufficient resources for radiologic screening (30%); using non-physician staff for screening (30%); and minimizing the time healthcare providers need to contribute (23%). Conversely, the top three barriers were lack of resources for screening and treatment (60%); insufficient time to address complex patient problems (36%); and perceived lack of patient buy-in (30%). Models for EBP implementation provide stepwise guidance; however, particular contextual factors act as facilitators or barriers to the process. Findings inform EBP implementation efforts regarding resources and key barriers to success around organizational-level supports and promotion of suitable EBP programs.