Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic body radiation therapy
Purpose To determine the long-term natural history of size change in SBRT-treated HCC to identify an imaging biomarker to help assess treatment response. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive HCCs treated with SBRT from January 2008 to December 2016 with either 2 years post-tr...
Saved in:
Published in | Abdominal imaging Vol. 45; no. 11; pp. 3698 - 3708 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.11.2020
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
To determine the long-term natural history of size change in SBRT-treated HCC to identify an imaging biomarker to help assess treatment response.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive HCCs treated with SBRT from January 2008 to December 2016 with either 2 years post-treatment MRI follow-up or post-treatment resection histology. Size, major features for HCC, and mRECIST and LI-RADS v.2018 treatment response criteria were assessed at each post-treatment MRI. Local progression, distant progression, and survival were modeled with Kaplan Meier analyses.
Results
56 HCCs met inclusion criteria. Mean baseline HCC diameter was 30 mm (range: 9–105 mm). At 3 months, 76% (
N
= 43) of treated HCCs decreased in size (mean reduction: 8 mm, range: 5–99 mm) and 0% (
N
= 0) increased in size. By 24 months, 11% (
N
= 5) had increased in size and were considered local progression. APHE remained in 77% (43/56) at 3 months, 38% (19/50) at 12 months, and 23% (11/47) at 24 months. mRECIST-defined viable disease was observed in 77% (43/56) at 3 months and 20% (9/47) at 24 months. LI-RADS v.2018 criteria identified viable or equivocal disease in 0% at 3 months and 10% (5/47) at 24 months.
Conclusion
Gradual loss of APHE and slow decrease in size are normal findings in HCCs treated with SBRT, and persistent APHE does not indicate viable disease. mRECIST is not accurate in the assessment of HCC after SBRT due to an overreliance on APHE to define viable disease. Increasing mass size or new nodular APHE at the treatment site may indicate local progression. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2366-004X 2366-0058 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-020-02532-4 |