A Response to the Paal et al. Rejoinder: Religiosity and Risk of Parkinson’s Disease in England and the USA

This commentary provides a response to the rejoinder by Paal et al. (Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01726-y , 2023), regarding the research of Otaiku (Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01603-8 , 2022) “Religiosity and risk of Parki...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of religion and health Vol. 62; no. 6; pp. 4215 - 4221
Main Author Koenig, Harold G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.12.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Aging
Clinical Psychology
Drug dosages
Head injuries
Impressionistic Reporting
Longitudinal studies
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Parkinson's disease
Public Health
Regression analysis
Religion
Religious Studies
Sensitivity analysis
Spirituality
Religiosity
Abidemi I. Otaiku
Parkinson’s disease
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This commentary provides a response to the rejoinder by Paal et al. (Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01726-y , 2023), regarding the research of Otaiku (Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01603-8 , 2022) “Religiosity and risk of Parkinson’s disease in England and the USA.” After providing a brief overview of Otaiku’s work, the commentary then addresses each of Paal et al.’s arguments. While agreeing that more research needs to be undertaken, this commentary concludes that Otaiku’s research findings are well founded, suggesting that greater religiosity may lower the risk of PD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4197
1573-6571
DOI:10.1007/s10943-022-01734-y