Use of a Schelin catheter for transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) prior to iTIND procedure

Background/Objectives Endorsing the principles of minimal invasiveness in benign-prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery, we conducted the first evaluation of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin catheter® (SC) prior to iTIND positioning. Subjects/Methods Of 23 patients enrolled,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProstate cancer and prostatic diseases Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 832 - 833
Main Authors Secco, Silvia, Olivero, Alberto, Longoni, Mattia, Dell’Oglio, Paolo, Tappero, Stefano, Dibilio, Edoardo, Saccucci, Tommaso, Siena, Giampaolo, Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo, Galfano, Antonio, Cindolo, Luca
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.09.2025
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1365-7852
1476-5608
1476-5608
DOI10.1038/s41391-024-00892-2

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background/Objectives Endorsing the principles of minimal invasiveness in benign-prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery, we conducted the first evaluation of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin catheter® (SC) prior to iTIND positioning. Subjects/Methods Of 23 patients enrolled, 11 (48%) received TUIA via SC whereas the remaining underwent standard anesthesia protocol. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS). Results No differences between cohorts were observed for pain during the device implantation and removal. Conversely, significantly lower median VAS scores were reported at 24- (1.0 vs. 3.0) and 48- (1.0 vs. 2.5) hour follow-up favoring TUIA. Conclusions SC TUIA offers effective pain control during iTIND procedures, supporting its use in outpatient settings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1365-7852
1476-5608
1476-5608
DOI:10.1038/s41391-024-00892-2