Atlas of 35 patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in andrology: a comprehensive overview of literature

Introduction Disorders of male sexual health and functioning are complex and can have significant deleterious effects on patients psychological wellbeing and interpersonal relationships. It is well recognised that clinicians have an overall poor understanding of the true effect that disease has on t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of urology Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 371 - 404
Main Authors Brown, G., Somani, B. K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Disorders of male sexual health and functioning are complex and can have significant deleterious effects on patients psychological wellbeing and interpersonal relationships. It is well recognised that clinicians have an overall poor understanding of the true effect that disease has on their patients and self-reported patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) aim to better communicate these issues. PROMs are generally welcomed by patients and their use in this highly sensitive area of clinical practice is well recognised. An atlas of available PROMs for key conditions in andrology is presented in this article. Methods A comprehensive search of world literature was conducted from the inception of databases to June 2022, to identify male-specific PROMs relevant to four key andrological disorders: hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, penile curvature and disorders of ejaculation. Each tool was evaluated in narrative format. Results 35 PROMs were identified. 6 were designed for the assessment of hypogonadism, 18 for erectile dysfunction, one for penile curvature and 10 for ejaculatory disorders. In general, PROMs were brief, self-administered and user-friendly. There was sufficient scope and variety in all categories (apart from penile curvature) to give the clinician flexibility in tool selection and find an appropriate tool for different scenarios. Conclusion A number of PROMs exist within andrology that can be utilised in both research and clinical settings. PROMs enable subjective evaluation of difficult-to-assess aspects of the patient experience.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-022-04246-2