Prediction of imminent fracture risk in Canadian women and men aged 45 years or older: external validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM)

• Published in: Osteoporosis international Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 57 - 66
• Main Authors: Möller, Sören, Skjødt, Michael K., Yan, Lin, Abrahamsen, Bo, Lix, Lisa M., McCloskey, Eugene V., Johansson, Helena, Harvey, Nicholas C., Kanis, John A., Rubin, Katrine Hass, Leslie, William D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer London 01.01.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Age; Bone Density; Bone mineral density; Canada - epidemiology; Endocrinology; Female; Fractures; Health care; Hip; Hip Fractures - epidemiology; Hip Fractures - etiology; Humans; Male; Manitoba - epidemiology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Original Article; Orthopedics; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology; Osteoporotic Fractures - etiology; Population; Population studies; Predictions; Public health; Rheumatology; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Women; Canada; Manitoba; Manitoba Canada; Automated risk calculation; External validation; Prediction models; Osteoporotic fractures
• ISSN: 0937-941X; 1433-2965; 1433-2965
• DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06165-1

Summary The Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) identifies individuals at high imminent risk of major osteoporotic fractures. We validated FREM on 74,828 individuals from Manitoba, Canada, and found significant fracture risk stratification for all FREM scores. FREM performed better than age alone but not as well as FRAX® with BMD. Introduction The FREM is a tool developed from Danish public health registers (hospital diagnoses) to identify individuals over age 45 years at high imminent risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fracture (HF). In this study, our aim was to examine the ability of FREM to identify individuals at high imminent fracture risk in women and men from Manitoba, Canada. Methods We used the population-based Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Program registry, and identified women and men aged 45 years or older undergoing baseline BMD assessment with 2 years of follow-up data. From linked population-based data sources, we constructed FREM scores using up to 10 years of prior healthcare information. Results The study population comprised 74,828 subjects, and during the 2 years of observation, 1612 incident MOF and 299 incident HF occurred. We found significant fracture risk stratification for all FREM scores, with AUC estimates of 0.63–0.66 for MOF for both sexes and 0.84 for women and 0.65–0.67 for men for HF. FREM performed better than age alone but not as well as FRAX® with BMD. The inclusion of physician claims data gave slightly better performance than hospitalization data alone. Overall calibration for 1-year MOF prediction was reasonable, but HF prediction was overestimated. Conclusion In conclusion, the FREM algorithm shows significant fracture risk stratification when applied to an independent clinical population from Manitoba, Canada. Overall calibration for MOF prediction was good, but hip fracture risk was systematically overestimated indicating the need for recalibration.