Laparoscopic pyeloplasty as an alternative to nephrectomy in adults with poorly functioning kidneys due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction

• Published in: International urology and nephrology Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 269 - 273
• Main Authors: Nascimento, Bruno, Andrade, Hiury S., Miranda, Eduardo P., Barbosa, João Arthur Brunhara Alves, Moscardi, Paulo R., Arap, Marco A., Mitre, Anuar I., Srougi, Miguel, Srougi, Victor, Duarte, Ricardo J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.02.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adults; Comparative analysis; Epidermal growth factor receptors; Glomerular filtration rate; Kidneys; Laparoscopy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nephrectomy; Nephrology; Renal function; Scintigraphy; Success; Surgery; Urology; Urology - Original Paper; Uteropelvic junction obstruction; Pyeloplasty
• ISSN: 0301-1623; 1573-2584
• DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02626-4

Objectives To evaluate outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in adults with poorly functioning kidney due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods A retrospective comparative analysis was performed between adult patients who underwent LP due to UPJO with differential renal function (DRF) ≤ 15% and DRF > 15%. LP success rate and complications were assessed. LP success was defined as symptoms improvement and DRF improvement or stabilization. DRF and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were analyzed before and 12 months after surgery to evaluate renal function recovery. DRF was estimated using Tc-99 m DMSA renal scintigraphy. Results Among 121 LP performed in the study period at our institution, 15 and 42 were included in the DRF ≤ 15% and DRF > 15% groups, respectively. At a median follow-up of 17.8 months, all patients with DRF ≤ 15% reported symptoms improvement. LP success rate was 86.7% and 90.5% ( p  =  0.65 ) for patients with DRF ≤ 15% and DRF > 15%, respectively. There were no complications in the DRF ≤ 15% group, while there were three complications recorded in the DRF > 15% group (Clavien 2 and 3b). In the DRF ≤ 15% group, mean pre-operative and post-operative DRF was 9.5% ± 3.6 and 10.5% ± 7.8 ( p  = 0.49), respectively. Median pre-operative and post-operative eGFR was 68.5 ml/min and 79.8 ml/min ( p  = 0.93), respectively. Two patients had DRF improvement after LP. Conclusions LP in adult patients with UPJO and poor function kidneys is an effective and safe procedure. DRF recovery is seen in a minority of the patients; however, LP is an alternative to nephrectomy.