Added value of an artificial intelligence algorithm in reducing the number of missed incidental acute pulmonary embolism in routine portal venous phase chest CT

• Published in: European radiology Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 367 - 373
• Main Authors: Langius-Wiffen, Eline, de Jong, Pim A., Mohamed Hoesein, Firdaus A., Dekker, Lisette, van den Hoven, Andor F., Nijholt, Ingrid M., Boomsma, Martijn F., Veldhuis, Wouter B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.01.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Algorithms; Artificial intelligence; Chest; Computed tomography; Diagnostic Radiology; Diagnostic systems; Embolism; Embolisms; Imaging; Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence; Internal Medicine; Interventional Radiology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neuroradiology; Pulmonary embolisms; Radiology; Sensitivity; Ultrasound; Pulmonary embolism; Retrospective studies; Algorithms; Computed tomography; Artificial intelligence
• ISSN: 1432-1084; 0938-7994; 1432-1084
• DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10029-z

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incremental value of artificial intelligence (AI) compared to the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists alone in detecting incidental acute pulmonary embolism (PE) on routine portal venous contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT). Methods CTs of 3089 consecutive patients referred to the radiology department for a routine contrast-enhanced chest CT between 27–5-2020 and 31–12-2020, were retrospectively analysed by a CE-certified and FDA-approved AI algorithm. The diagnostic performance of the AI was compared to the initial report. To determine the reference standard, discordant findings were independently evaluated by two readers. In case of disagreement, another experienced cardiothoracic radiologist with knowledge of the initial report and the AI output adjudicated. Results The prevalence of acute incidental PE in the reference standard was 2.2% (67 of 3089 patients). In 25 cases, AI detected initially unreported PE. This included three cases concerning central/lobar PE. Sensitivity of the AI algorithm was significantly higher than the outcome of the initial report (respectively 95.5% vs. 62.7%, p  < 0.001), whereas specificity was very high for both (respectively 99.6% vs 99.9%, p  = 0.012). The AI algorithm only showed a slightly higher amount of false-positive findings (11 vs. 2), resulting in a significantly lower PPV (85.3% vs. 95.5%, p  = 0.047). Conclusion The AI algorithm showed high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing incidental PE, detecting an additional 25 cases of initially unreported PE, accounting for 37.3% of all positive cases. Clinical relevance statement Radiologist support from AI algorithms in daily practice can prevent missed incidental acute PE on routine chest CT, without a high burden of false-positive cases. Key Points • Incidental pulmonary embolism is often missed by radiologists in non-diagnostic scans with suboptimal contrast opacification within the pulmonary trunk. • An artificial intelligence algorithm showed higher sensitivity detecting incidental pulmonary embolism on routine portal venous chest CT compared to the initial report. • Implementation of artificial intelligence support in routine daily practice will reduce the number of missed incidental pulmonary embolism.