Risk stratification by combining common genetic mutations and TERT promoter methylation in papillary thyroid cancer
Purpose Risk stratification based on somatic mutations in TERT promoter and BRAF / RAS has been well established for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), and there is emerging evidence showed that TERT promoter methylation was frequently observed in thyroid cancer patients with adverse features. This stu...
Saved in:
Published in | Endocrine Vol. 85; no. 1; pp. 304 - 312 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.07.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
Risk stratification based on somatic mutations in
TERT
promoter and
BRAF
/
RAS
has been well established for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), and there is emerging evidence showed that
TERT
promoter methylation was frequently observed in thyroid cancer patients with adverse features. This study was aimed to comprehensive explore the prognostic value of
BRAF
/
RAS
mutations,
TERT
promoter mutations, and
TERT
promoter methylation in PTC.
Methods
The relationships of
BRAF
/
RAS
mutations,
TERT
promoter mutations, and
TERT
promoter methylation with clinical characteristics and outcomes of PTC were analyzed in 382 patients with PTC.
Results
TERT
promoter mutation and hypermethylation were collectively observed in 52 (13.6%) samples and associated with
BRAF
/
RAS
mutation, aggressive clinical characteristics, and poor clinical outcomes of PTC. Coexistence of
BRAF
/
RAS
and
TERT
alterations was found in 45 of 382 (11.8%) PTC patients and strongly associated with old patient age, extrathyroidal extension, advanced pathologic T stage and metastasis. Importantly, patients with both
BRAF
/
RAS
and
TERT
alterations had higher rates of tumor recurrence (13.6% vs 1.5%,
P
= 0.042) and disease progression (24.4% vs 3.3%,
P
< 0.001) than patients without any alterations, and cox regression analysis revealed that the coexistence of
BRAF
/
RAS
and
TERT
alterations, but not
BRAF
/
RAS
or
TERT
alterations alone, increased the risk of progression-free interval with an adjusted HR of 10.35 (95% CI: 1.79–59.81,
P
= 0.009).
Conclusions
This study suggested that comprehensively analysis of
BRAF
/
RAS
mutations,
TERT
promoter mutation and methylation is an effective strategy to identify high-risk patients with PTC. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1559-0100 1355-008X 1559-0100 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12020-024-03722-6 |