Immunological factors linked to geographical variation in vaccine responses

• Published in: Nature reviews. Immunology Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 250 - 263
• Main Authors: van Dorst, Marloes M. A. R., Pyuza, Jeremia J., Nkurunungi, Gyaviira, Kullaya, Vesla I., Smits, Hermelijn H., Hogendoorn, Pancras C. W., Wammes, Linda J., Everts, Bart, Elliott, Alison M., Jochems, Simon P., Yazdanbakhsh, Maria
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.04.2024; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 631/250/255; 631/250/590; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Environmental factors; Geographical variations; Immunization; Immunogenicity; Immunology; Low income areas; Malaria; Review Article; Rotavirus; Tropical diseases; Vaccines; Vector-borne diseases; Yellow fever
• ISSN: 1474-1733; 1474-1741
• DOI: 10.1038/s41577-023-00941-2

Vaccination is one of medicine’s greatest achievements; however, its full potential is hampered by considerable variation in efficacy across populations and geographical regions. For example, attenuated malaria vaccines in high-income countries confer almost 100% protection, whereas in low-income regions these same vaccines achieve only 20–50% protection. This trend is also observed for other vaccines, such as bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), rotavirus and yellow fever vaccines, in terms of either immunogenicity or efficacy. Multiple environmental factors affect vaccine responses, including pathogen exposure, microbiota composition and dietary nutrients. However, there has been variable success with interventions that target these individual factors, highlighting the need for a better understanding of their downstream immunological mechanisms to develop new ways of modulating vaccine responses. Here, we review the immunological factors that underlie geographical variation in vaccine responses. Through the identification of causal pathways that link environmental influences to vaccine responsiveness, it might become possible to devise modulatory compounds that can complement vaccines for better outcomes in regions where they are needed most. The protective effect of vaccines is often poorest in low-income countries. Here, the authors explore the immunological factors that may explain the geographical variation in vaccine responsiveness and the ways in which they might be modulated to ensure effective vaccination in regions where it is needed most.