Intraoperative Examination of Retro-Areolar Margin is not Routinely Necessary During Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Cancer

• Published in: Annals of surgical oncology Vol. 30; no. 11; pp. 6488 - 6496
• Main Authors: Serio, Francesca, Manna, Elena, La Pinta, Massimo, Arienzo, Francesca, Costarelli, Leopoldo, Zarba Meli, Emanuele, Loreti, Andrea, Mastropietro, Tiziana, Broglia, Laura, Ascarelli, Alessandra, Apicella, Giuseppina, Rossi, Rosalinda, Piccolino, Gianmarco, Fortunato, Lucio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.10.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Breast Oncology; Cancer; Mastectomy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Multivariate analysis; Oncology; Pathology; Surgery; Surgical Oncology; Nipple sparing; Breast cancer; Intra-operative examination; Retro-areolar margin
• ISSN: 1068-9265; 1534-4681
• DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13726-7

Background Intraoperative examination of retro-areolar margin (IERM) often is used during nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for cancer, but there is no robust data regarding its real advantage. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing NSM for cancer with omission of IERM according to institutional protocols from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The decision to maintain or remove the Nipple-Areola Complex (NAC) after definitive pathology was taken at the multidisciplinary meeting. Results Among 162 women operated in the study period, the presence of neoplastic cells within 2 mm from the inked retroareolar margin (RAM) was detected at permanent pathology in 17 cases (10.5%). Nipple-Areola-Complex (NAC) was removed postoperatively in five patients (3%) for margins <1 mm, the other 12 were observed, whereas postoperative NAC necrosis required surgical removal in additional five cases (3%). The NAC was thus preserved in 152 of 162 patients (94%). At multivariate analysis, RAM ≤2 mm was associated with radiological tumor-to-nipple distance less than or equal to 1 cm ( p = 0.04) and Ki67 label index ≥ 20 ( p = 0.04), whereas multifocality/multicentricity showed a trend towards significance ( p = 0.07). At a median follow-up of 46 months, five locoregional relapses occurred (3%), only one of them involving the NAC (0, 6%). Locoregional relapse and overall survival for patients with RAM > or < 2 mm were not different. Conclusions IERM is not routinely necessary during NSM for cancer, because its omission is associated with a very low return to the operating room, it is oncologically safe, and associated pitfalls are avoided. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.